Remedies. While a petition is pending, a federal district or appellate court may stay any state court proceeding against the petitioner. When an indigent death row petitioner files for appointment of counsel before filing a legally sufficient petition for habeas relief, the habeas proceeding has commenced for purposes of § 2251, and the federal court is consequently authorized to stay the execution. A federal court granting habeas relief has wide discretion in choosing the appropriate remedy. Courts have ordered the state to resentence a petitioner, reclassify a petitioner's conviction, or grant the petitioner a retrial on specific issues. Unconditional release of the petitioner is a remedy of last resort, generally granted only when a state has failed to comply with federal court orders specifying other forms of relief.
Review Proceedings: Habeas Relief for State Prisoners (2020 Update) - Remedies.
- Details
- By Georgetown University and The Georgetown Law Journal Georgetown University and The Georgetown Law Journal
- Parent Category: Criminal Justice and Racism
- Category: Post-Conviction
- Hits: 21554
Article Index
- Review Proceedings: Habeas Relief for State Prisoners (2020 Update)
- Custody Requirement
- Cognizable Claims
- Exhaustion Requirement
- Procedural Bar
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Evidentiary Hearings
- Right to Legal Assistance
- Filing Deadlines
- Dismissal of Petitions
- Second or Successive Petitions
- Remedies
- Appeals
- Capital Cases (Death Penalty)
- All Pages
Page 12 of 14
Vernellia R. Randall
Founder and Editor
Professor Emerita of Law
The University of Dayton School of Law
Email
Recent Articles
- The Displaced Persons Act of 1948 and Home-grown Antisemitism
- Indoctrination at its Apex: ‘Stop Woke Act’ and its Ramifications on Law Schools and Professors of Color
- Revising the Indian Plenary Power Doctrine
- Disrupting Dominance
- Protecting Humanity's Cradle of Civilization: Advancing the Right to Self-determination for Indigenous Peoples in the Middle East & South Caucasus
- Intertribal: The Unheralded Element in Indigenous Wildlife Sovereignty
- Deserving Life: How Judicial Application of Medical Amnesty Laws Perpetuates Substance Use Stigma
- I Saw Guns and Sharp Swords in the Hands of Young Children”: Why Mental Health Courts for Juveniles with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum/disorder Are Needed
- How Critical Is Critical Race Theory
- Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Indigenous Peoples' Rights: The Key to Developing International Environmental Laws That Promote Harmonious Relationships with Nature
Copyright Notice
Race, Racism and the Law
Vernellia R. Randall
licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Fair Use Notice
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s). In general, the copyright owner is the author of the article.