Dismissal of Petitions. After a state prisoner has filed a § 2254 petition, the judge assigned promptly examines it. If it appears plain on the face of the petition and all exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief, then the judge is permitted, but not obliged, to dismiss the petition and notify the petitioner. If not, the judge must order the state to either (1) file a response within a fixed time or (2) take other action. The judge will order the respondent to file an answer within a fixed time. The state's answer shall indicate what transcripts are available, when they can be furnished, and what proceedings have been recorded but not transcribed. If a petitioner appeals a conviction or adverse judgment in a post-conviction proceeding, a copy of the petitioner's brief on appeal and the opinion of the appellate court, if any, shall also be filed with the answer. Petitioners may voluntarily move to dismiss their own petitions.
Review Proceedings: Habeas Relief for State Prisoners (2020 Update) - Dismissal of Petitions.
- Details
- By Georgetown University and The Georgetown Law Journal Georgetown University and The Georgetown Law Journal
- Parent Category: Criminal Justice and Racism
- Category: Post-Conviction
- Hits: 21549
Article Index
- Review Proceedings: Habeas Relief for State Prisoners (2020 Update)
- Custody Requirement
- Cognizable Claims
- Exhaustion Requirement
- Procedural Bar
- Jurisdiction and Venue
- Evidentiary Hearings
- Right to Legal Assistance
- Filing Deadlines
- Dismissal of Petitions
- Second or Successive Petitions
- Remedies
- Appeals
- Capital Cases (Death Penalty)
- All Pages
Page 10 of 14
Vernellia R. Randall
Founder and Editor
Professor Emerita of Law
The University of Dayton School of Law
Email
Recent Articles
- The Displaced Persons Act of 1948 and Home-grown Antisemitism
- Indoctrination at its Apex: ‘Stop Woke Act’ and its Ramifications on Law Schools and Professors of Color
- Revising the Indian Plenary Power Doctrine
- Disrupting Dominance
- Protecting Humanity's Cradle of Civilization: Advancing the Right to Self-determination for Indigenous Peoples in the Middle East & South Caucasus
- Intertribal: The Unheralded Element in Indigenous Wildlife Sovereignty
- Deserving Life: How Judicial Application of Medical Amnesty Laws Perpetuates Substance Use Stigma
- I Saw Guns and Sharp Swords in the Hands of Young Children”: Why Mental Health Courts for Juveniles with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum/disorder Are Needed
- How Critical Is Critical Race Theory
- Protecting Traditional Knowledge and Indigenous Peoples' Rights: The Key to Developing International Environmental Laws That Promote Harmonious Relationships with Nature
Copyright Notice
Race, Racism and the Law
Vernellia R. Randall
licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Fair Use Notice
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, some material on this website is provided for comment, background information, research and/or educational purposes only, without permission from the copyright owner(s), under the "fair use" provisions of the federal copyright laws. These materials may not be distributed for other purposes without permission of the copyright owner(s). In general, the copyright owner is the author of the article.